A senior IAS official in Haryana has brought inconsistencies up in the information aggregated by state government for recipients under Parivar Pehchan Patra, a fantasy task of Boss Clergyman Manohar Lal Khattar, even as another senior IAS official disproved the cases saying the technique embraced to arrive at the figures by the previous “is completely wrong”.
The irregularities have been called attention to by 1991-group IAS official Ashok Khemka in a letter to V Umashankar, Head Secretary (Resident Assets Data Division).
“Certain information irregularities in the Parivar Pehchan Patra (PPP) have come to see, which is being brought to your thoughtful notification for fitting activity. As educated, the PPP data set contains 68 lakh families with 2.5 crore numbers. This infers that according to PPP, there are 3.68 individuals per family. While, according to the projected Evaluation information for 2021, the number of inhabitants in the state is 2.95 crores with 67.60 lakh families, that is, there are 4.36 individuals per family. With comparable number of families in PPP and the projected Statistics information, the missing 45 lakhs should be accommodated,” perused Khemka’s letter.
Further expounding his conflicts, Khemka, in his letter, said that starting today, a sum of 88% records are refreshed in the PPP information. “The absolute pay of the 88% refreshed records in the PPP information is educated to be Rs 1,71,012 crore. Though, according to the Financial Review 2021, the GSDP of the state for the year 2020-21 is Rs 7,64,872 crore at current costs, that is, just about multiple times the pay appeared in PPP information. The pay figures in PPP is ex-facie unreliable”.”It is henceforth recommended, to more readily target state government assistance plans to the most unfortunate families, the BPL/Antyodaya family information might be made more solid, Aadhaar numbers might be cultivated into the BPL/Antyodaya information through an identification study and, last yet not the least, incorporate the traveler populace,” said Khemka, who is right now posted as Head Secretary of the a rchaeological office.
Umashankar, be that as it may, tore through the cases made by Khemka.
“Figures of the Enumeration that he (Khemka) is citing, are from a private site that is taking on the appearance of an administration site. There is a contrast among family and family. Under the PPP, we are gathering the family information. A family is a social develop. The word utilized in PPP is Parivaar (family). Evaluation takes a gander at families and houses. The premise on which he has inferred these figures, is completely wrong,” said Umashankar who is likewise Head Secretary to Head Minister.Elaborating the public authority’s check interaction about the announced livelihoods, Umashankar said, “We sent the primary part of around 45 lakh such revelations to CBDT (Focal Leading body of Direct Duties). It was tracked down that 27 lakh individuals have revealed their pay wrongly, no pay was found for around 10-12 lakh individuals presumably on the grounds that they are not recording IT-returns. Just around 3-4 lakh individuals have effectively revealed their pay. At that point, we sent another part of 50 lakh. That check is going on. Government workers’ information is now with us and can be checked. In the event of agribusiness pay, the public authority creates installment to the rancher and we can confirm the information from that point. Another class is work installment. If there should be an occurrence of private area, it is confirmed from work cess installment. We have different methods for confirming. Another confirmation interaction is checking from the power bill. For example, the least fortunate of the destitute individuals might not have any of these. For them, there will be an actual confirmation. A leader, a neighborhood IT administrator, a social extremist, an undergrad allocated by the college, and a volunteer from the neighborhood freely bear witness to the pay of that individual. On the off chance that three out of five concur, we expect that to be the pay of the individual,” Umashankar added.